What is a Cover?

Our new scanner arrived last week, and yesterday we spent some time experimenting with it and testing it out. One of the things that got scanned was corpus book #0001, an issue of Gulf Funny Weekly from 1934. This is the physically largest comic book in our entire corpus, so it made for a good test of the machine. 

Screen Shot 2019-06-13 at 9.26.40 AM.png

When I sent this image to Ben and Nick, Ben asked the obvious follow-up: How many comic books in our corpus don’t have covers?

What he meant by that is that GFW has a comics story on its first page, and that is counted as a one-page story (this issue has three one page stories and an ad in its four pages). A “cover” for our intents and purposes does not contain part of a story. While it might refer to one of the stories (as is often the case), it isn’t actually a part of it - it is a distinct formal element. 

Generally speaking, of course, magazines have covers, and books have covers. Newspapers, on the other hand, have front pages. It is not terribly surprising that GFW is more akin to a newspaper than to a magazine or book. Indeed, this issue is a newsprint page fold in half to make four pages. GFW seems like an anomaly in our corpus. We have three issues, and none of them have covers.

The other series that is similar are The Spirit supplements, which, of course, ran in newspapers. We have seven Spirit supplements in the corpus, and none has a “cover” - everyone of them simply begins the story on the first page, like so:

Screen Shot 2019-06-12 at 1.37.07 PM.png

All of this would add up to the pretty simple observation that newspaper-aligned comic books don’t have covers, while magazine-aligned comic books (which are the vast majority of them) do. Were it not for this:

0.jpg

This is corpus book #0078, Silver Streak Comics #21, published by Lev Gleason in 1942. At first glance, this seemed to have a cover - like most comic books of the period there is a distinction between the glossy cover stock and the interior paper that suggests a magazine tradition. 

Closer inspection, however, troubles that conclusion. The fact is, the story featuring the Saint starts, as the text says, “here”. This is page one of the lead thirteen-page story (the book has eight stories in its 68 pages). However, unlike The Spirit supplements, there are some “cover” elements here beyond the paper stock. Notably, the “In This Issue!” Portion of the page acts like a traditional cover, drawing attention to interior features. From this standpoint, it seems to be both a cover and not a cover. It’s Schrödinger’s Cat Comics #21.

Screen Shot 2019-06-13 at 9.01.39 AM.png

Just to add to our confusion, this is the next story page: 

Note that that pagination indicates that this page, the third, is the first page of the story, contradicting the “cover”.

So, it’s anomalous and we’ll ponder it. But then, what about this:

Screen Shot 2019-06-13 at 9.43.57 AM.png

That is corpus book #1128. Some might argue that a two-panel comic stretches the definition of “story”, but for our purposes that is a distinct story. Indeed, that 68-page comic book contains a whopping 57 stories, none longer than a single page. Many of them even have their own titles!

I think it’s interesting (but not analytically defensible) that, on first pass, the issue of Jughead’s Jokes was coded as if it has a cover but Silver Streak Comics was coded as if it does not. There are additional Archie comics in the corpus that similarly have “covers” with stories on them - although very few other publishers did the same.

All this is a reminder that coding decisions matter and that consistency will be a major consideration as we move forward. I’ve already changed the “cover” of this Jughead’s Jokes to an other story - this issue now has 58 stories in it.

OMG. A Sampling Frame Error

A few people have asked, with an ever so slightly increasing level of annoyance, “when are you publishing your Sampling Frame?” or “Hey! Didn’t you promise to publish your Sampling Frame?” or, from the co-investigators, “Weren’t we supposed to make the Sampling Frame available?”.

Yes, we said we would. And we will.

Right now it’s a bit of a victim of my perfectionism. I live in constant fear that there are errors. Indeed, last week, while coding ads in comic books from the mid-1980s I realized we had the wrong issue of Teen Titans in our collection. That sent me into a minor frenzy of checking the Sampling Frame, to see if there was an error there that had led to an error in the corpus. It turns out that there was not - the error had been in the purchasing end, driven by clicking on the wrong Teen Titans series. Sloppy, but not a big problem (the correct issue has already been purchased).

Today, though, I learned of a genuine error.

61xMcKBkm-L._SY346_.jpg

I was reading Love on the Racks: A History of American Romance Comics by Michelle Nolan (recommended, by the way). In her introduction she notes that Michael Vassallo has noted that the stories originally intended for Atlas’s Love Tales #59 were actually printed in Lovers #42 (October 1952). Love Tales was cancelled with #58. However, when the title was brought back three years later the first new issue was #60. Apparently, because the stories for #59 had been paid for, the assumption was that it had been released. But it had not, it had been shifted. So there is no Love Tales #59.

The GCD has this information correct - their listing skips #59. MyComicShop, unfortunately for us, has a listing for #59 (though, obviously, no cover art). And Overstreet lists it as having been published. So, two of our three data sources had it, and we went with the majority, but the majority was in error.

None of this really impacts us at all. It does not change the number of comics sampled from 1953 (which is where we included it) and it wasn’t randomly selected (or this would have been caught earlier), although it does mean that our essay about the Sampling Frame has a minor inaccuracy, and that drives me crazy,

So, that is why we still haven’t published the Sampling Frame - I’m still desperately, probably vainly, trying to locate all the bugs.

823741.jpg